Which market price should Brigade use?
This applies before a kitchen supplies its own purchasing data. Brigade should produce a useful professional-kitchen benchmark without treating grocery, wholesale, foodservice, and farm prices as interchangeable.
Zero-state benchmark onlyStart with sources we can use now.
Build the public-data baseline and an allowlisted web-search fallback first. Measure what remains uncovered before entering a paid data contract or sales process.
The engine chooses evidence in this order.
What sends a line to each pool?
| Recipe signal | Primary pool | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Case, carton, sack, bulk weight, foodservice pack | Foodservice → wholesale | Professional pack language excludes grocery evidence unless no compatible alternative exists. |
| Fresh produce by case or weight | Regional wholesale | Use compatible USDA terminal/shipping-point or licensed commodity evidence; preserve grade, size, origin, and region. |
| Raw meat, seafood, dairy, poultry, eggs | Wholesale commodity | Cut, grade, fat level, fresh/frozen state, and market geography must agree before evidence is eligible. |
| Generic pantry staple in professional quantity | Foodservice → wholesale | Prefer restaurant or commodity evidence. Retail is a fallback, not part of the same median. |
| Named retail brand or consumer package | Retail/package | Brand and package are part of the specification. Do not substitute a generic wholesale commodity silently. |
| Small R&D batch with consumer-size wording | Retail/package | Retail can be the realistic purchase context. Label it as retail and keep the professional-kitchen alternative available if supported. |
| Specialty ingredient with no wholesale coverage | Retail proxy | Return the best compatible retail reference with a wider range and explicit fallback wording. |
| Wholesale and retail sources both available | Context-selected pool | Select one market level. Never average the two or infer an unsupported wholesale discount from retail. |
| Unclear form, grade, package, or conversion | Open / clarification | Show the known context or range, but do not let incompatible evidence become a confident point estimate. |
Interpretation can be flexible. Money selection cannot.
Agent may propose
- Ingredient concept and specification.
- Likely purchasing context.
- Candidate source pools and query variants.
- A plain-language explanation of the chosen evidence.
Engine must decide
- Which observations are eligible.
- Unit and package conversion.
- Market-level separation.
- Point estimate, range, warnings, and provenance.
The chef sees the result and why it was used.
Use restaurant or wholesale evidence normalized to pounds.
The named consumer product makes retail evidence appropriate.
No compatible foodservice evidence was available.
Test sources before licensing or enabling them.
Send the same 326 audited ingredient queries to Expana, S&P, Buyers Edge, and Foodbuy. Compare specification coverage, freshness, unit compatibility, geography, added coverage beyond USDA, display rights, and error against a held-out restaurant price set.